"the butterfly" vs "cheek anchor " .any one familiar with butterfly style shootiing? pros and cons in accuracy and power with the same draw weight ?
"the butterfly" vs "cheek anchor "
#1
Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:45 AM
"the butterfly" vs "cheek anchor " .any one familiar with butterfly style shootiing? pros and cons in accuracy and power with the same draw weight ?
#2
Posted 17 June 2011 - 05:03 AM
#3
Posted 17 June 2011 - 06:23 AM
#4
Posted 17 June 2011 - 10:39 AM
#5
Posted 17 June 2011 - 01:48 PM
#6
Posted 17 June 2011 - 02:04 PM
Tex-Shooter, on 17 June 2011 - 01:48 PM, said:
Dont complain my friend , its still dirt cheap compared to where i live a Toyota Camry starts at 150,000 sgd which is 122,000 USD? beat that . if you still feel suckish go here http://www.sgcarmart.com search under new cars , and u can feel my pain . and the price does not include road tax and registration etc etc .
#7
Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:06 PM
../../public/style_emoticons/default/wub.gif
#8
Posted 17 June 2011 - 08:05 PM
#9
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:04 PM
Butterfly
Theraband Black - 1 3/8" x 7/8" x 12 1/4"
Draw length = 60"
Draw weight @60" = 6 lb 6 oz
3/8" steel = 238 fps
Face Anchor
Theraband Gold - 3/4" x 8 1/4" straight cut
Draw length = 30" (to ear)
Draw weight @30" = 8 lb 12 oz
3/8" steel = 188 fps
Note: I previously tested Theraband Gold cut to 3/4" x 9/16" x 8 1/4". Draw weight and velocity were slightly less than the 3/4" straight cut.
Cheers,
Northerner
Edited by Northerner, 19 June 2011 - 09:12 AM.
#10
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:39 PM
Tex-Shooter, on 17 June 2011 - 08:05 PM, said:
I am with you on this on Tex. I am in the market for a new truck.
#11
Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:36 AM
Northerner, on 18 June 2011 - 09:04 PM, said:
Butterfly
Theraband Black - 1 3/8" x 7/8" x 12 1/4"
Draw length = 60"
Draw weight @60" = 6 lb 6 oz
3/8" steel = 238 fps
Face Anchor
Theraband Gold - 3/4" x 8 1/4" straight cut
Draw length = 30" (to ear)
Draw weight @30" = 8 lb 12 oz
3/8" steel = 188 fps
Note: I previously tested Theraband Gold cut to 3/4" x 9/16" x 8 1/4". Draw weight and velocity were slightly less than the 3/4" straight cut.
Cheers,
Northerner
Yes, indeed ... it stands to reason that with a greater draw length (within reason) you will get higher velocities. For one thing, your draw weight will usually be greater, so the force on the projectile will be greater. And for another thing, the force will have a longer time to work on accelerating the projectile.
My problem is accuracy. In butterfly mode I am not nearly as accurate as drawing to the face. I am one of those poor folks who aims, rather than shooting intuitively. For me, all the power in the world is of no use if I cannot hit what I am aiming at.
Cheers ...... Charles
#12
Posted 19 June 2011 - 10:40 AM
kcmetalic, on 17 June 2011 - 02:04 PM, said:
Tex-Shooter, on 17 June 2011 - 01:48 PM, said:
Dont complain my friend , its still dirt cheap compared to where i live a Toyota Camry starts at 150,000 sgd which is 122,000 USD? beat that . if you still feel suckish go here http://www.sgcarmart.com search under new cars , and u can feel my pain . and the price does not include road tax and registration etc etc .
NO thread hijack, but same as in Thailand. Cars there are many, many times their price due to government tax to discourage purchase, not to make money on it really, but people still buy those cars and the roads are still congested.
Just to understand what im saying, think if buying whatever car you have now, but multiply the price by 4
Now back to thread, I seem to be MUCH less accurate with butterfly, but MUCH faster. Some amazing speed, but shots are wild.
Edited by ERdept, 19 June 2011 - 10:41 AM.
#13
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:21 PM
kcmetalic, on 17 June 2011 - 04:45 AM, said:
I´m a pure "albatross" shooter.
Albatross- pro: much less draw weight for the same speed/power...
Albatross-con: no visible anchor point. Here is the anchor point somethin what you have to FEEL, because he is behind your head! I think this makes it a bit harder to shoot accurate.
If you draw to your cheek or corner of the mouth or to your ear makes it easier to anchor consistently at the exactly same point. Thats a big advantage when it comes to accuracy.
Tough, I like the butterfly style more. I shoot much more accurate with this style than with the fruitfly (short draw) style. I don`t know why.
AND: I LIKE THE SPEED
At least it`s all a question of personal preferences.
Regards
Torsten
#14
Posted 19 June 2011 - 12:52 PM
#15
Posted 19 June 2011 - 01:33 PM
But since you also have some excellent braced starships, you don't need butterfly for speed anyway. A starship combines draw length and cheek anchor.
Edited by JoergS, 19 June 2011 - 01:34 PM.
#16
Posted 19 June 2011 - 01:33 PM
Hi Torsten - Any good tips on how you get that accuracy with fly shooting? I have watched the Geco vidos a few times but I'm still crappy at fly.
http://www.youtube.com/user/GekoGR
Cheers,
Northerner
Edited by Northerner, 19 June 2011 - 02:33 PM.
#17
Posted 19 June 2011 - 03:15 PM
Flatband, on 19 June 2011 - 12:52 PM, said:
These Czech guys are really very accurate. But I think not better than other top shooters with fruitfly style. And I think it`s also a question of what style or way you shoot most of your slingshot carreer.
Using the fist grip has disadvantages: the larger ammo you need for this grip is killing the speed. If you will achieve the same speed with this larger ammo, you have to use much stronger bands. And this kills accuracy (ok, not so for tobse
@ Northerner
I`m not THAT good shooter as you may think when you see some youtube vids. Indeed, I`m very inconsistent, believe me! Sometimes I have a few minutes of some good shooting
But seriously, the only tip I have is the same like Smitty: practice, practice and more practice!!
Regards
Torsten
#18
Posted 19 June 2011 - 03:55 PM
Northerner, on 19 June 2011 - 01:33 PM, said:
Hi Torsten - Any good tips on how you get that accuracy with fly shooting? I have watched the Geco vidos a few times but I'm still crappy at fly.
http://www.youtube.com/user/GekoGR
Cheers,
Northerner
Right ... I was assuming the same band length for both styles.
Cheers ..... Charles
#19
Posted 20 June 2011 - 12:33 PM
#20
Posted 21 June 2011 - 04:08 AM
torsten, on 19 June 2011 - 03:15 PM, said:
But seriously, the only tip I have is the same like Smitty: practice, practice and more practice!!
Regards
Torsten
hey Torsten stapel mal nicht so tief
i meet torsten 2 Weeks ago, and i saw his bad minutes! torsten shoot from 20m on a 5cm Target!
and when he shoots 5 cm besides, he thinks it's bad
ok the Fistgrip is a not a grip for every body but i like it. and right, only for big ammo!
a friend demolished my fork when hi test the Fistgrip!
Regards
Tobse
#21
Posted 21 June 2011 - 05:07 AM
#22
Posted 21 June 2011 - 05:38 PM
Cheers ..... Charles
#23
Posted 21 June 2011 - 07:59 PM
Charles, on 21 June 2011 - 05:38 PM, said:
Cheers ..... Charles
Your definitely Gorgeous with the Beard so I would say instread of getting it Snatched why not wax it and braid it like the Pirate Captain John Sparrow. It just might also be a Good Look too. Or you could shoot with your arms way above your head. I will try it and see what we can come up with but if I shoot myself I will not post the video. Now there.
Oh Yea, and that is me in the Picture.
Edited by dgui, 21 June 2011 - 08:03 PM.
#24
Posted 21 June 2011 - 09:45 PM
dgui, on 21 June 2011 - 07:59 PM, said:
Charles, on 21 June 2011 - 05:38 PM, said:
Cheers ..... Charles
Your definitely Gorgeous with the Beard so I would say instread of getting it Snatched why not wax it and braid it like the Pirate Captain John Sparrow. It just might also be a Good Look too. Or you could shoot with your arms way above your head. I will try it and see what we can come up with but if I shoot myself I will not post the video. Now there.
Oh Yea, and that is me in the Picture.
You sly dog, you .....!
Cheers ...... Charles
#25
Posted 27 June 2011 - 09:42 AM
let the bands barely touch my cheekbone. The downside of butterfly shooting is shorter bandlife and sometimes I get an ache in my thumbjoint.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


