Jump to content


Remove Advertisments and Support the Site!
- - - - -

Slingshoot Butterfly Style Slo-mo Fork Hit


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 mxred91

mxred91

    750 Club

  • Members
  • 785 posts
  • LocationBolingbrook, IL

Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:57 AM


I was shooting my new Black Walnut Ergo slingshot Butterfly stye, with double blue therabands. Really to hard to pull for me. I caught a fork hit with a clay (kitty litter) ball. I thought it looked cool, so video below. I changed to single blue bands later in the day and it was much more fun to shoot.



#2 joseph_curwen

joseph_curwen

    250 Club

  • Members
  • 289 posts
  • LocationFrance

Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:35 AM

Waw!!! Impressive!

#3 Sam

Sam

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location"Great" Britain

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:15 AM

No shooting glasses! Posted Image

#4 NaturalFork

NaturalFork

    Appreciate nature.

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 4,193 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:41 AM

I think most fork hits come from the way we let go of the pouch.

#5 Sam

Sam

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location"Great" Britain

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:44 AM

View PostRecurveMaster, on 05 September 2010 - 09:41 AM, said:

I think most fork hits come from the way we let go of the pouch.
Yup...

#6 dgui

dgui

    3000+ Club

  • Members
  • 4,333 posts
  • Locationusa

Posted 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM

Shootin Gangstha Style has a higher than usual probability of producing Fork Hits. So does haveing the Forks Too Wide. And you were not wearing a glove and shooting glasses.

#7 smitty

smitty

    Brotherhood Of The Slingshot

  • Silver Sponsor
  • 2,095 posts
  • LocationColorado

Posted 05 September 2010 - 10:57 AM

Great idea to show the slow motion video of the fork hit! I enjoyed the cool explosion!Posted Image

#8 NaturalFork

NaturalFork

    Appreciate nature.

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 4,193 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire

Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM

View Postdgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:

Shootin Gangstha Style has a higher than usual probability of producing Fork Hits. So does haveing the Forks Too Wide. And you were not wearing a glove and shooting glasses.

Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.

#9 mxred91

mxred91

    750 Club

  • Members
  • 785 posts
  • LocationBolingbrook, IL

Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:52 PM

Yes I should use glasses. I noticed when I watched the slow motion I could see where I misaligned the bands just before release. Lighter bands have helped, I shot for an hour later in the day, no fork hits.

#10 USASlingshot

USASlingshot

    1000 Club

  • Members
  • 1,236 posts
  • LocationCanandaigua,NY

Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:57 PM

View PostRecurveMaster, on 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM, said:

View Postdgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:

Shootin Gangstha Style has a higher than usual probability of producing Fork Hits. So does haveing the Forks Too Wide. And you were not wearing a glove and shooting glasses.

Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.


i have tried an old pair of motocrosse gloves and it worked pretty good. but i dont get alot of hand slap so i dont use it alot

#11 mr.joel

mr.joel

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 913 posts

Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM

He(unlike some people) is a grown man, it's up to him to wear safety glasses and gloves. He can smoke crack and fly the space shuttle if he wants to, just as long as he's aware of the potential consequences.

#12 NaturalFork

NaturalFork

    Appreciate nature.

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 4,193 posts
  • LocationNew Hampshire

Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:05 PM

View Postmr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:

He(unlike some people) is a grown man, it's up to him to wear safety glasses and gloves. He can smoke crack and fly the space shuttle if he wants to, just as long as he's aware of the potential consequences.

Amen.

#13 USASlingshot

USASlingshot

    1000 Club

  • Members
  • 1,236 posts
  • LocationCanandaigua,NY

Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:17 PM

View Postmr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:

He(unlike some people) is a grown man, it's up to him to wear safety glasses and gloves. He can smoke crack and fly the space shuttle if he wants to, just as long as he's aware of the potential consequences.


most people do not wear glasses when they shoot. i will admit i have never wore glasses to shoot. its just something i have never done

#14 Flatband

Flatband

    2000 Club

  • Moderators
  • 2,176 posts
  • LocationNY Metro Region

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:01 PM

REAL COOL EXPLOSION! Glad to see you weren't injured in your eye or any where else.Singles for me with Butterfly! Flatband :)

#15 ZDP-189

ZDP-189

    "Small, fat bear"

  • Moderators
  • 3,404 posts
  • LocationHong Kong

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:23 PM

View Postmr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:

He(unlike some people) is a grown man

I think Sam was trying to be helpful. I'm always happy when my kids remind me to fasten my seatbelt (or remind me not to smoke crack on the way to the launch pad :lol: ). Taking risks is indeed something we learn not to do as we go through life. I have scars from motorcycle accidents, a bad shoulder from years of skydiving, and once got a pot of steel stuck through the middle of my eye because I wasn't wearing glasses. That a youngster knows not to do them is a good thing.

#16 Dayhiker

Dayhiker

    3000+ Club

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 5,813 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:23 AM

Quote

once got a pot of steel stuck through the middle of my eye
Posted Image
. . . how big was this "pot"? Pls explain.

#17 huey224

huey224

    500 Club

  • Members
  • 525 posts
  • Locationaustralia

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:31 AM

That looks sooo cool!!




#18 Sam

Sam

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location"Great" Britain

Posted 06 September 2010 - 07:50 AM

View Postmr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:

He(unlike some people) is a grown man, it's up to him to wear safety glasses and gloves. He can smoke crack and fly the space shuttle if he wants to, just as long as he's aware of the potential consequences.
Posted Image

#19 Tex-Shooter

Tex-Shooter

    2000 Club

  • Supporting Vendor
  • 2,704 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 06 September 2010 - 08:01 AM

The butterfly term for shooting is new and I like it, but the style has been around for a long time. I do think that you get more hits on forks and fingers with low and narrow forks. I have this opinion because observation. Just because you have shot for awhile without a fork hit does not mean that it will not happen. Just because you have shot for awhile without getting hit in the eye, does not mean that it will not happen. It only takes once to permanently damage an eye or finger. I have known several very good flip shooters and every one of them have shot their self sometime by the shot hanging in the pouch. There are 5 main styles of shooting, the standard cheek lock out, the semi-butterfly, the full butterfly, the instinctive and the flip. There are also combinations of these. From what I have observed, probably the safest of all the styles is the standard cheek lock out. With any style that you choose try to understand the dangers that might happen and protect yourself as best you can. Always wear safety glasses above all else. If you shoot yourself in the hand you will probably recover, but please don't take a chance on your eyes. -- Tex

#20 dgui

dgui

    3000+ Club

  • Members
  • 4,333 posts
  • Locationusa

Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:22 AM

Tex, you are always grounded to the trunk of the tree with Logic and good Horse sence. Just think on this, why not theoretcally correct with more narrow forks guiding more preciesly the projectile. Since I have gone to narrow forks (the most narrow being 3/4 inch space) the fork hits have been eliminated all together. I also hold my shooters at a minimum 15 degree angel forward. This has produced increased hits to targets. But, perhaps in time I will be proven wrong. Tex, I always value and appreciate your comments and opinions.

#21 dgui

dgui

    3000+ Club

  • Members
  • 4,333 posts
  • Locationusa

Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:24 AM

View PostRecurveMaster, on 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM, said:

View Postdgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:

Shootin Gangstha Style has a higher than usual probability of producing Fork Hits. So does haveing the Forks Too Wide. And you were not wearing a glove and shooting glasses.

Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.


Golfing, Batting, Workout Gloves are excellent.

#22 Tex-Shooter

Tex-Shooter

    2000 Club

  • Supporting Vendor
  • 2,704 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:10 AM

Actually I went to wider forks for accuracy! I never had a problem except when wing shooting with either hitting the fork. I do shoot a wide fork much more consistent than a narrow one. I like about 2 1/2 inches or a little better between the tips for more accurate shooting. Hey to each his own though. Some like a .177 and some like a 22. Hmmm, am I meaning an air rifle or a firearm! -- Tex <_<

#23 Sam

Sam

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location"Great" Britain

Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:32 PM

View PostTex-Shooter, on 06 September 2010 - 10:10 AM, said:

Actually I went to wider forks for accuracy! I never had a problem except when wing shooting with either hitting the fork. I do shoot a wide fork much more consistent than a narrow one. I like about 2 1/2 inches or a little better between the tips for more accurate shooting. Hey to each his own though. Some like a .177 and some like a 22. Hmmm, am I meaning an air rifle or a firearm! -- Tex <_<
Lol if you were a British Citizen it would definitely be the former! Posted Image As for a firearm I prefer a .22LR over a .177HMR any day, simply because of their respective costs. Posted Image

Oh and the whole .177 vs .22 debate is fraught with inaccuracies on both sides. Over here we're limited to a muzzle energy of 12ft/lb before it legally becomes a Section 1 Firearm - which are now, thanks to animals like Derrick Bird, almost impossible to obtain. Posted Image So I'm a little perplexed as to why anyone would want to use a .22 here... Posted Image

#24 mr.joel

mr.joel

    Banned

  • Banned
  • 913 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 04:58 PM

[quote name='Tex-Shooter' date='06 September 2010 - 05:01 PM' timestamp='1283781673' post='24119']
The butterfly term for shooting is new and I like it, but the style has been around for a long time. I do think that you get more hits on forks and fingers with low and narrow forks. I have this opinion because observation. Just because you have shot for awhile without a fork hit does not mean that it will not happen. Just because you have shot for awhile without getting hit in the eye, does not mean that it will not happen. It only takes once to permanently damage an eye or finger. I have known several very good flip shooters and every one of them have shot their self sometime by the shot hanging in the pouch. There are 5 main styles of shooting, the standard cheek lock out, the semi-butterfly, the full butterfly, the instinctive and the flip. There are also combinations of these. From what I have observed, probably the safest of all the styles is the standard cheek lock out. With any style that you choose try to understand the dangers that might happen and protect yourself as best you can. Always wear safety glasses above all else. If you shoot yourself in the hand you will probably recover, but please don't take a chance on your eyes. --

This is most definitely true, but packing around safety glasses isn't likely for most of us. Shades suffice(although of course substandard)in lieu of.

#25 Dayhiker

Dayhiker

    3000+ Club

  • Bronze Sponsor
  • 5,813 posts
  • LocationUSA

Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:04 PM

oops

Edited by Dayhiker, 06 September 2010 - 05:07 PM.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Remove Advertisments and Support the Site!