I was shooting my new Black Walnut Ergo slingshot Butterfly stye, with double blue therabands. Really to hard to pull for me. I caught a fork hit with a clay (kitty litter) ball. I thought it looked cool, so video below. I changed to single blue bands later in the day and it was much more fun to shoot.
Slingshoot Butterfly Style Slo-mo Fork Hit
#1
Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:57 AM
I was shooting my new Black Walnut Ergo slingshot Butterfly stye, with double blue therabands. Really to hard to pull for me. I caught a fork hit with a clay (kitty litter) ball. I thought it looked cool, so video below. I changed to single blue bands later in the day and it was much more fun to shoot.
#2
Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:35 AM
#3
Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:15 AM
#4
Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:41 AM
#6
Posted 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM
#7
Posted 05 September 2010 - 10:57 AM
#8
Posted 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM
dgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:
Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.
#9
Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:52 PM
#10
Posted 05 September 2010 - 06:57 PM
RecurveMaster, on 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM, said:
dgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:
Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.
i have tried an old pair of motocrosse gloves and it worked pretty good. but i dont get alot of hand slap so i dont use it alot
#11
Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM
#13
Posted 05 September 2010 - 08:17 PM
mr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:
most people do not wear glasses when they shoot. i will admit i have never wore glasses to shoot. its just something i have never done
#14
Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:01 PM
#15
Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:23 PM
mr.joel, on 05 September 2010 - 08:04 PM, said:
I think Sam was trying to be helpful. I'm always happy when my kids remind me to fasten my seatbelt (or remind me not to smoke crack on the way to the launch pad
#16
Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:23 AM
Quote
. . . how big was this "pot"? Pls explain.
#17
Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:31 AM
#19
Posted 06 September 2010 - 08:01 AM
#20
Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:22 AM
#21
Posted 06 September 2010 - 09:24 AM
RecurveMaster, on 05 September 2010 - 11:55 AM, said:
dgui, on 05 September 2010 - 10:45 AM, said:
Spesking of shooting gloves. Can anyone recommend one? I havent been able to fins anything really.
Golfing, Batting, Workout Gloves are excellent.
#22
Posted 06 September 2010 - 10:10 AM
#23
Posted 06 September 2010 - 12:32 PM
Tex-Shooter, on 06 September 2010 - 10:10 AM, said:
Oh and the whole .177 vs .22 debate is fraught with inaccuracies on both sides. Over here we're limited to a muzzle energy of 12ft/lb before it legally becomes a Section 1 Firearm - which are now, thanks to animals like Derrick Bird, almost impossible to obtain.
#24
Posted 06 September 2010 - 04:58 PM
The butterfly term for shooting is new and I like it, but the style has been around for a long time. I do think that you get more hits on forks and fingers with low and narrow forks. I have this opinion because observation. Just because you have shot for awhile without a fork hit does not mean that it will not happen. Just because you have shot for awhile without getting hit in the eye, does not mean that it will not happen. It only takes once to permanently damage an eye or finger. I have known several very good flip shooters and every one of them have shot their self sometime by the shot hanging in the pouch. There are 5 main styles of shooting, the standard cheek lock out, the semi-butterfly, the full butterfly, the instinctive and the flip. There are also combinations of these. From what I have observed, probably the safest of all the styles is the standard cheek lock out. With any style that you choose try to understand the dangers that might happen and protect yourself as best you can. Always wear safety glasses above all else. If you shoot yourself in the hand you will probably recover, but please don't take a chance on your eyes. --
This is most definitely true, but packing around safety glasses isn't likely for most of us. Shades suffice(although of course substandard)in lieu of.
#25
Posted 06 September 2010 - 05:04 PM
Edited by Dayhiker, 06 September 2010 - 05:07 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


