below is a vid from games keeper john, it is very telling how fork width can effect your shot speed, i have felt it in shooting different types of ss's but without a chrony it was just a guess, hope you enjoy.
this one confirms something i have been thinking!
Started by
newconvert
, Feb 08 2012 10:56 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:56 AM
below is a vid from games keeper john, it is very telling how fork width can effect your shot speed, i have felt it in shooting different types of ss's but without a chrony it was just a guess, hope you enjoy.
#2
Posted 08 February 2012 - 11:58 AM
Already been posted.
#3
Posted 08 February 2012 - 12:36 PM
hmmmmmm? i never saw it?
#4
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:29 PM
230 vs 260 ... 13% increase. HUGE diff in fork width.
Seems to me that diff in fork width for "realistic" frame designs is much much less.
So, imo, speed diff due to fork width would be very small.
Seems to me that diff in fork width for "realistic" frame designs is much much less.
So, imo, speed diff due to fork width would be very small.
#5
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:46 PM
Knoll, on 08 February 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:
230 vs 260 ... 13% increase. HUGE diff in fork width.
Seems to me that diff in fork width for "realistic" frame designs is much much less.
So, imo, speed diff due to fork width would be very small.
Seems to me that diff in fork width for "realistic" frame designs is much much less.
So, imo, speed diff due to fork width would be very small.
i agree, but i have felt a bit more zip out of my PFS's than my wider fork varieties, its just interesting to me how many factors play into shooting a simple sling shot
#6
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:20 PM
welcome?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


